Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About us
Aims and Scope
Indexing and Abstracting
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licensing
Publication Fees
Fast-Track Paper Publication Option
Conflict Interest Guidance
Submit an Article
Special Issues
News & Editorials
“Fake,” “Predatory,” and “Pseudo” Journals: Charlatans Threatening Trust in Science
Shifting the Journal submission-review system to the Editorial System Manuscript December 27, 2017.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effect of normal physiologic childbirth program in mother-friendly hospitals on duration of labor
1
PhD candidate on Reproductive Health, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2
PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3
MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4
Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Online publication date: 2018-02-28
Publication date: 2018-02-28
Electron J Gen Med 2018;15(3):em21
KEYWORDS
natural childbirthprenatal educationnon-pharmacologic approachesfirst stage of laborlabor durationsecond stage of labor
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Normal physiologic childbirth program was implemented in mother-friendly hospitals of Iran after 2008. The aim of present study is to assess the effect of normal physiologic childbirth program in a mother-friendly hospital on duration of active phase and second stage of labor.
Methods:
This study was a clinical trial that was conducted at the Sina and Ommolbanin mother-friendly hospitals in Ahvaz, Mashhad, Iran, in 2016. The intervention group of 77 women was offered the childbirth preparation classes during pregnancy and normal physiologic childbirth program during labor and the control group of 77 women received routine care.
Results:
The results showed that after controlling the confounding factors, the active phase and second stage of labor were significantly shorter in the intervention group (p<0.001).
Conclusion:
Complete implementation of normal physiologic childbirth program can reduce the duration of labor.
Normal physiologic childbirth program was implemented in mother-friendly hospitals of Iran after 2008. The aim of present study is to assess the effect of normal physiologic childbirth program in a mother-friendly hospital on duration of active phase and second stage of labor.
Methods:
This study was a clinical trial that was conducted at the Sina and Ommolbanin mother-friendly hospitals in Ahvaz, Mashhad, Iran, in 2016. The intervention group of 77 women was offered the childbirth preparation classes during pregnancy and normal physiologic childbirth program during labor and the control group of 77 women received routine care.
Results:
The results showed that after controlling the confounding factors, the active phase and second stage of labor were significantly shorter in the intervention group (p<0.001).
Conclusion:
Complete implementation of normal physiologic childbirth program can reduce the duration of labor.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Comprehensive Guide for the provision of obstetric services. Iran's Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Maternity Health Office, Family and population Health Office. Third edition. 2013 (In Persian).
2.
A national guide for normal delivery and the provision of pharmacological and non-pharmaceutical methods for reducing labor pain. Iran's Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Maternity Health Office, Family and Population Health Office. 2011 (In Persian).
3.
Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, Uccella S, Piazza N, Serati M, et al. Use of an antispasmodic (rociverine) to shorten the length of labor: a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2011;90(12):1371-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600... PMid:21880029.
4.
Lowe NK. A review of factors associated with dystocia and cesarean section in nulliparous women. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2007;52(3):216-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh... PMid:17467588.
5.
Le Ray C, Audibert F, Goffinet F, Fraser W. When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009;201(4):361. e1-. e7.
6.
Harrison MS, Ali S, Pasha O, Saleem S, Althabe F, Berrueta M, et al. A prospective population-based study of maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in the setting of prolonged labor, obstructed labor and failure to progress in low-and middle-income countries. Reprod health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4... PMid:26063492 PMCid:PMC4464213.
7.
Sedigh Mobarakabadi S, Mirzaiinajmabadi K, Ghazi Tabatabaie M. Ambivalence towards childbirth in a medicalized context: a qualitative inquiry among Iranian mothers. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2015;17(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.... PMid:26019905 PMCid:PMC4441778.
8.
Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2002;186(5):S160-S72. PMid:12011880.
9.
Downe S, Gyte G, Dahlen H, Singata M. Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to im-prove outcomes for women and babies at term. Status and date: New, published in. 2013(7).
10.
Eggebø T, Hassan W, Salvesen K, Lindtjørn E, Lees C. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two‐center study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;43(2):195-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13... PMid:24105705.
11.
Ferguson S, Davis D, Browne J. Does antenatal education affect labour and birth? A structured review of the literature. Women and Birth. 2013;26(1):e5-e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.womb... PMid:23063931.
12.
Talbot R. Self-efficacy: women's experiences of pain in labour. British Journal of Midwifery. 2012;20(5). https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.....
13.
Williams AdC, Morris J, Stevens K, Gessler S, Cella M, Baxter J. What influences midwives in estimating labour pain? European journal of pain. 2013;17(1):86-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532... PMid:22528747.
14.
Borges C, José C, Sancho P, Barros M, Sim-Sim M. Labor Pain: Perception of the Parturient and Midwife Evaluation. 2017.
15.
Kamyabi Z, Naderi T, Ramazani A. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the effects of pethidine on labor pain, uterine contractions and infant Apgar score. Ann Saudi Med. 2003;23(5):318-20. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4... PMid:16868406.
16.
Lowdermilk DL, Perry SE, Piotrowski KA. Maternity nursing: Mosby Elsevier New York; 2006.
17.
Schorn MN, McAllister JL, Blanco JD. Water immersion and the effect on labor. Journal of nurse-midwifery. 1993;38(6):336-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-2....
18.
Rooks JP. Labor pain management other than neuraxial: what do we know and where do we go next? Birth. 2012;39(4):318-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.1... PMid:23281953.
19.
Prabhakar D, George LS, Karkada S. Effectiveness of Ambulation during First Stage of Labour, on the Outcome of Labour among Primigravid Women in Selected Hospitals of Palakkad District, Kerala. International Journal of Nursing Education. 2015;7(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-9....
20.
Makvandi S, Mirteimoori M, Mirzaiinajmabadi K, Sadeghi R. A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Effect of Aromatherapy with Lavender on Labor Pain Relief. Nurse Care Open Acces J. 2016;1(3):1-6. https://doi.org/10.15406/ncoaj....
21.
de Moura Linck V, da Silva AL, Figueiró M, Piato ÂL, Herrmann AP, Birck FD, et al. Inhaled linalool-induced sedation in mice. Phytomedicine. 2009;16(4):303-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phym... PMid:18824339.
22.
Re L, Barocci S, Sonnino S, Mencarelli A, Vivani C, Paolucci G, et al. Linalool modifies the nicotinic receptor–ion channel kinetics at the mouse neuromuscular junction. Pharmacological Research. 2000;42(2):177-82. https://doi.org/10.1006/phrs.2... PMid:10887049.
23.
Peana AT, D'Aquila PS, Panin F, Serra G, Pippia P, Moretti MDL. Anti-inflammatory activity of linalool and linalyl acetate constituents of essential oils. Phytomedicine. 2002;9(8):721-6. https://doi.org/10.1078/094471... PMid:12587692.
24.
Makvandi S, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Sadeghi R, Karimi L. Effect of birth ball on labor pain relief: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2015;41(11):1679-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12... PMid:26419499.
| eISSN: | 2516-3507 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
