Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About us
Aims and Scope
Indexing and Abstracting
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licensing
Publication Fees
Fast-Track Paper Publication Option
Conflict Interest Guidance
Submit an Article
Special Issues
News & Editorials
“Fake,” “Predatory,” and “Pseudo” Journals: Charlatans Threatening Trust in Science
Shifting the Journal submission-review system to the Editorial System Manuscript December 27, 2017.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effectiveness of diabetes mellitus management program at primary health care level
1
West Kazakhstan State Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan
2
Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
3
Al Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Online publication date: 2019-12-25
Publication date: 2019-12-25
Electron J Gen Med 2019;16(6):em172
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Annotation:
Diabetes mellitus is considered not only a serious chronic disease, but also as an important medical and social problem that is becoming increasingly important. Disease management programs are needed to empower patients and help them develop the necessary skills for self-management of their condition.
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of the Type 2 Diabetes Management Program at the primary health care level.
Methods:
Study design is a prospective study, case-control. The study of the intervention group included 114 adults with type 2 diabetes participating in the Disease Management Program and the control group - 60 adults with type 2 diabetes not participating in the Disease Management Program. All the investigated persons live in the service area of the municipal polyclinic No. 4 of Aktobe city (Aktobe region, Western region of Kazakhstan). A traditional care which included regular follow-ups every 3 months was provided in the control group. The selection of patients in the control group was carried out by random sampling. Both groups were randomized by age, gender, and duration of illness. The main result evaluated glycated hemoglobin levels, blood pressure, body mass index, and low density lipoprotein levels after 9 months.
Results:
According to the data obtained after 9 months of the study the analysis showed a decrease in the average level of glycated hemoglobin in the intervention group (7.8 ± 1.5%) compared with the control group (8.6 ± 1.8%) (p <0.05). And also in the intervention group (134.6 ± 12.5 and 83.3 ± 6.5) compared with the control group (125.7 ± 10.4 and 80.7 ± 6.2), systolic and diastolic blood pressure is shown below. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups according to body mass index and low-density lipoprotein.
Findings:
This Diabetes Management Program allows you to control such indicators as glycated hemoglobin and blood pressure in a positive direction. While both body mass index and low density lipoproteins remained at the same level due to the short observation time.
Diabetes mellitus is considered not only a serious chronic disease, but also as an important medical and social problem that is becoming increasingly important. Disease management programs are needed to empower patients and help them develop the necessary skills for self-management of their condition.
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of the Type 2 Diabetes Management Program at the primary health care level.
Methods:
Study design is a prospective study, case-control. The study of the intervention group included 114 adults with type 2 diabetes participating in the Disease Management Program and the control group - 60 adults with type 2 diabetes not participating in the Disease Management Program. All the investigated persons live in the service area of the municipal polyclinic No. 4 of Aktobe city (Aktobe region, Western region of Kazakhstan). A traditional care which included regular follow-ups every 3 months was provided in the control group. The selection of patients in the control group was carried out by random sampling. Both groups were randomized by age, gender, and duration of illness. The main result evaluated glycated hemoglobin levels, blood pressure, body mass index, and low density lipoprotein levels after 9 months.
Results:
According to the data obtained after 9 months of the study the analysis showed a decrease in the average level of glycated hemoglobin in the intervention group (7.8 ± 1.5%) compared with the control group (8.6 ± 1.8%) (p <0.05). And also in the intervention group (134.6 ± 12.5 and 83.3 ± 6.5) compared with the control group (125.7 ± 10.4 and 80.7 ± 6.2), systolic and diastolic blood pressure is shown below. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups according to body mass index and low-density lipoprotein.
Findings:
This Diabetes Management Program allows you to control such indicators as glycated hemoglobin and blood pressure in a positive direction. While both body mass index and low density lipoproteins remained at the same level due to the short observation time.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Tazhbenova S, Yermukhanova L, Artykbayeva M, Kuspangalieva G. Prevalence of diabetes in the world and in the republic of Kazakhstan. Astana Medical Journal, 2018;4(98):21-32.
2.
Mehring M, Donnachie E, Bonke FC, Werner C, Schneider A. Disease management programs for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a longitudinal population-based descriptive study. Diabetol Metab Syndr., 2017;9:91-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098... PMid:28529546 PMCid:PMC5437566.
3.
Khunti K, Gray LJ, Skinner T, Carey ME, Realf K, Dallosso H, Fisher H, Campbell M, Heller S, Davies MJ. Effectiveness of a diabetes education and self management programme (DESMOND) for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: three year follow-up of a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care, BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition), 2012;344(7860):15. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2... PMid:22539172 PMCid:PMC3339877.
4.
Aktaeva LM, Garkalov KA, Kulkaeva GU. Implementation of disease management programs in practical health care: Guidelines. Astana, 2013:39.
5.
Shu-Fang VW, Shu-Yuan L, Tsae-Jyy W, Mei-Hui C, Yu-Mei J, Kuei-Chen C. Self-management intervention to improve quality of life and psychosocial impact for people with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Nurs., 2014;20(17-18):2655-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365... PMid:21605212.
6.
Pranee CL, Supunnee T. Diabetes type 2 self-management among Thai Muslim women. J of Nurs and Health Care of Chro Illness, 2011;3(1):52-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752....
7.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2017.
8.
Chiu-Cu L, Robert MA, Chao-Sung, C, Bonnie MH, Charol JL. Development and testing of the diabetes self-management instrument: a confirmatory analysis. Research in Nurs & Health, 2008;31(4):370-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20... PMid:18213627.
9.
Rian AP, Tippamas C, Charuwan K. The effect of dietary and exercise self management support program on dietary behavior, exercise behavior and clinical outcomes in Muslim patients with poorly controlled type 2 DM in a community setting in Indonesia. NurseMdia Journal of Nursing, 2015:5-14. https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.....
10.
McGowan P. The efficacy of diabetes patient education and self-management education in type 2 diabetes. Can J Diab, 2011;35:46e53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-....
11.
WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee, Use of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus: Abbreviated Report of a WHO Consultation World Health Organization, Geneva (2011).
12.
Patil SJ, Ruppar T, Koopman RJ, et al. Peer support interventions for adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis of hemoglobin A1c outcomes, Ann. Fam. Med., 2016;14(6):540-51. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.19... PMid:28376441 PMCid:PMC5389404.
13.
Zhang X, Yang S, Sun K, et al. How to achieve better effect of peer support among adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Patient Educ. Couns., 2016;99(2):186-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.... PMid:26463156.
14.
Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, Malanda B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2018;(138):271-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diab... PMid:29496507.
15.
Dale JR, Williams SM, Bowyer V. What is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review. Diabet. Med., 2012;29(11):1361-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464... PMid:22804713.
16.
Busse R, Blümel M, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Zentner A. Tackling chronic disease in Europe: Strategies, interventions and challenges. Observatory Studies Series - Copenhagen: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2010;20:88-96.
17.
Tlemisov VB, Zhumagulov TT, Kurmanbaeva KJ. Disease management program for three nosologies (hypertension, diabetes, chronic heart failure). Health Manager of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2016;3-4.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2516-3507 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
