Purpose: The study aims to analyze the enhanced recovery protocol’s (ERP) effectiveness in a comparative study of elective surgeries for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).
Methods: The prospective study included 30 patients with UPJO who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty in 2018-2021.
Results: Postoperative complications developed rarely, and their frequency and severity were comparable. Independent predictors of UPJO recurrence were the spine osteochondrosis >II period (HR 13.97; 95% CI 1.26; 154.8; p=0.032), the concretions self-discharge (HR 28.49; 95% CI 1.78; 455.62; p=0.018), surgical operation duration > 110 minutes (HR 44.7; 95% CI 3.95; 505.4; p=0.002) and previous nephrostomy (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02; 1.13; p=0.002).
Conclusions: In the surgical treatment of UPJO, it is advisable to use ERPs, as this allows achieving a better
treatment quality with comparable results.
REFERENCES(26)
1.
Weitz M, Schmidt M, Laube G. Primary non-surgical management of unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: A systematic review. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32:2203-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467... PMid:28012005.
Krajewski W, Wojciechowska J, Dembowski J, Zdrojowy R, Szydełko T. Hydronephrosis in the course of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: An underestimated problem? Current opinions on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017;26(5):857-64. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/... PMid:29068584.
Szydelko T, Tuchendler T, Litarski A, Urbańczyk G, Apoznański W, Janczak D. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes procedure as a treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction caused by fibroepithelial polyp. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013;8(4):361-3. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.... PMid:24501609 PMCid:PMC3908643.
Fukumoto Y, Hata T, Masuzawa T, et al. [A case of stenosis at the junction of the renal pelvis and ureter after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2021;48(13):1987-9. PMid:35045469.
Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Neururer R, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced color doppler imaging (CDI), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of crossing vessels in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Eur Urol. 2008;53(6):1254-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euru... PMid:18037558.
Kostakis ID, Sran H, Uwechue R, et al. Comparison between robotic and laparoscopic or open anastomoses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Robot Surg. 2019;6:27-40. https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S... PMid:31921934 PMCid:PMC6934120.
Pisarev DI, Novikov OO, Nikitin KS, Boyko NN, Sakanyan KM, Novikovа MY. Selection of optimal conditions for the separation of curcuminoids by high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE) using micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC). Drug Dev Registr. 2022;11(2):145-52. https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-....
Bitkina TA, Basevich AV. Development of the composition and technology of a combined drug based on microspheres with doxorubicin hydrochloride and comenic acid. Drug Dev Registr. 2022;11(2):118-25. https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-....
Li L, Qiu M, Gong B, Wang Y, Feng Q. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ureteral stent for risk factors of restenosis after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Palliat Med. 2021; 10(10):10527-34. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-2... PMid:34763499.
Rickard M, Chua M, Dos Santos J, Brownrigg N, Lorenzo AJ. Evolving trends in peri-operative management of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Working towards quicker recovery and day surgery pyeloplasty. World J Urol. 2022;40:1283-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345... PMid:34997295.
Rickard M, Chua M, Kim JK, et al. Evolving trends in peri-operative management of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Working towards quicker recovery and day surgery pyeloplasty. World J Urol. 2021;39:3677-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345... PMid:33660089.
Ekin RG, Celik O, Ilbey YO. An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68:245-51. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2... PMid:26251754 PMCid:PMC4526614.
Uhlig A, Uhlig J, Trojan L, Hinterthaner M, von Hammerstein-Equord A, Strauss A. Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction–A systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2019;19:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894... PMid:31711468 PMCid:PMC6849262.
Rybchenko OI, Suslov VV, Kedik SA, Domnina YuM, Mogaibo AI. Flow dispersion for obtaining ivermectin encapsulated in polycaprolactone microparticles. Drug Dev Registr. 2022; 11(2):79-86. https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-....
Nayyar R, Kumar P, Panaiyadiyan S, Seth A. Ureter-first approach and reduction of pelvis: Standardizing handling of ureteropelvic junction during pyeloplasty. Urology. 2021;160:210-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urol... PMid:34813830.
Morsi HA, Mursi K, Abdelaziz AY, Elsheemy MS, Salah M, Eissa MA. Renal pelvis reduction during dismembered pyeloplasty: Is it necessary? J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(3):303-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpur... PMid:22459589.
Farouk A, Tawfick A, Reda M, et al. Fibrin glue as a sealant in stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A randomised controlled trial. Arab J Urol. 2019;17(3):228-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/209059... PMid:31489240 PMCid:PMC6711147.
Danuser H, Germann C, Pelzer N, Rühle A, Stucki P, Mattei A. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: Results of a prospective randomised single-centre study. BJU Int. 2014;113(6):931-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12... PMid:24472002.
Abdelwahab M, Abdelaziz A, Aboulela W, et al. One week stenting after pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty; is it enough? J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(1):98.E1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpur... PMid:31786228.
Sankova MV, Kytko OV, Vasil’ev YL, et al. Medical students’ reactive anxiety as a quality criterion for distance learning during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Emerg Sci J. 2021;5:86-93. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2....
Diachkova E, Corbella S, Taschieri S, Tarasenko S. Nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: Case series. Dent J. 2020;8(3):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8030... PMid:32727061 PMCid:PMC7557973.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.