REVIEW ARTICLE
Surgical management of genital prolapse and combined gynecological pathologies in women: A meta-analysis
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN
 
2
Department of Health Policy and Organization, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN
 
 
Online publication date: 2023-01-04
 
 
Publication date: 2023-03-01
 
 
Electron J Gen Med 2023;20(2):em446
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Prolapse can be fixed using a variety of surgical procedures. The goal of the present study was to examine the current literature on various surgical techniques for treating female genital organ prolapse.

Methods:
The PubMed and Medline databases were explored for pertinent literature up through August 2022 for this meta-analysis. The terms [surgery] AND [management] AND [genital prolapse OR gynaecological diseases] AND [randomised control studies OR randomised control trials] were used as search criteria. The studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered qualified using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Cochrane handbook of “Systematic reviews of interventions” was used for risk of bias assessment.

Results:
The investigations found significant difference in the heterogeneity between the groups with a 76% I2 value (p<0.00001). There was little variability among the six trials that examined robotic and laparoscopic therapy of prolapse (I2=0%, p=0.94). In six investigations, the odd ratio revealed no statistically significant difference between groups (1.05; 95% CI, 0.52, 2.12). However, generally there were no appreciable differences between robotic and laparoscopic treatment of female prolapse. There was a low-risk bias among the selected studies.

Conclusion:
According to this meta-analysis study, laparoscopic surgery performed better job of managing prolapse than abdominal surgery.

 
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Baden WF, Walker T. Surgical repair of vaginal defects. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1992.
 
2.
Albo M, Dupont MC, Raz S. Transvaginal correction of pelvic prolapse. J Endourol. 1996;10(3):231-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.19... PMid:8740384.
 
3.
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-... PMid:9083302.
 
4.
Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Rahimi S, et al. Age-related pelvic floor modifications and prolapse risk factors in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2010;17(1):204-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b... PMid:19629013.
 
5.
Smith DA. Pelvic organ prolapse. A new option offers effectiveness and ease of use. Adv Nurse Pract. 2007;15(8):39-42.
 
6.
Wagner TH, Hu T-W. Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology. 1998;51(3):355-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-... PMid:9510336.
 
7.
Luber KM, Boero S, Choe JY. The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: Current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1496-501. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.20... PMid:11408873.
 
8.
Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in US women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b... PMid:19935030.
 
9.
Larouche M, Belzile E, Geoffrion R. Surgical management of symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):1061-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.00... PMid:33957652.
 
10.
Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: Gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.20... PMid:12066091.
 
11.
Detollenaere RJ, Den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, et al. Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: A randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial). BMC Women Health. 2011;11:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6... PMid:21324143 PMCid:PMC3045971.
 
12.
Kow N, Goldman HB, Ridgeway B. Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14(5):395-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934... PMid:23700096.
 
13.
Hefni M, El-Toukhy T, Bhaumik J, Katsimanis E. Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(3):645-50. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.20... PMid:12634635.
 
14.
Antosh DD, Grotzke SA, McDonald MA, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(3):158-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0b... PMid:22543767.
 
15.
Awad N, Mustafa S, Amit A, Deutsch M, Eldor-Itskovitz J, Lowenstein L. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy. Arch Gynecol Obstetrics. 2013;287(6):1181-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404... PMid:23274792.
 
16.
Chen SSC, Pang SMW, Cheung TH, Cheung RYK, Chung TKH. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: With or without robotic assistance. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17(1):54-60.
 
17.
Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy: A randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG. 2000;107(11):1380-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471... PMid:11117766.
 
18.
Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: A randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192... PMid:19834635 PMCid:PMC2808513.
 
19.
Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: Multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3... PMid:26206451 PMCid:PMC4512203.
 
20.
Hwang J-L, Seow K-M, Tsai Y-L, Huang L-W, Hsieh B-C, Lee C. Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: A prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(12):1132-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600... PMid:12519109.
 
21.
Miskry T, Magos A. Randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(4):351-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600... PMid:12716320.
 
22.
Härkki-Siren P, Sjöberg J, Toivonen J, Tiitinen A. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(10):866-71. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600... PMid:11304971.
 
23.
Seracchioli R, Venturoli S, Vianello F, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in the presence of a large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(3):333-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-... PMid:12101331.
 
24.
Paraiso MFR, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CCG, Barber MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1005-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b... PMid:21979458.
 
25.
Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17(1):44-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0b... PMid:22453672.
 
26.
Seror J, Yates DR, Seringe E, et al. Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. World J Urol. 2012;30(3):393-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345... PMid:21858540.
 
27.
Hefni MA, El-Toukhy TA. Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;127(2):257-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejog... PMid:16377061.
 
28.
Maher CF, Cary MP, Slack MC, Murray CJ, Milligan M, Schluter P. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(6):381-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192... PMid:11795641.
 
29.
Lo TS, Pue LB, Hung TH, Wu PY, Tan YL. Long‐term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(7):1099-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12... PMid:25808989.
 
30.
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/978111....
 
31.
Hagen S, Thakar R. Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynaecol Reprode Med. 2012;22(5):118-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm....
 
32.
Dieter AA. Pelvic organ prolapse: Controversies in surgical treatment. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48(3):437-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.... PMid:34416930.
 
33.
Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(4):712-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.20... PMid:11967496.
 
34.
Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: A comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecology. 2004;104(4):805-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG... PMid:15458906.
 
35.
Jelovsek JE, Gantz MG, Lukacz E, et al. Success and failure are dynamic, recurrent event states after surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(4):362.e1-.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog... PMid:33039390 PMCid:PMC8009767.
 
36.
Goode PS, FitzGerald MP, Richter HE, et al. Enhancing participation of older women in surgical trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(3):303-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamc... PMid:18722933 PMCid:PMC3208315.
 
37.
FitzGerald MP, Richter HE, Siddique S, Thompson P, Zyczynski H. Colpocleisis: A review. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17(3):261-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192... PMid:15983731.
 
38.
Schweitzer KJ, Vierhout ME, Milani AL. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women of 80 years of age and older. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(3):286-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001... PMid:15715538.
 
39.
Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1311-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.3... PMid:18799443 PMCid:PMC2918416.
 
40.
Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity tosymptoms and quality of life. BJOG. 2005;112(7):971-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471... PMid:15958002.
 
41.
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD004014. https://doi.org/10.1002/146518....
 
42.
Maher C. ICI 2012: Pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192... PMid:24142053.
 
43.
Iglesia CB, Hale DS, Lucente VR. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus transvaginal mesh for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):363-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192... PMid:22930214.
 
44.
Freeman R, Pantazis K, Thomson A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):377-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192... PMid:22864764.
 
45.
Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, et al. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euru... PMid:19201521.
 
46.
Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(2):367-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b... PMid:19155908.
 
47.
Denman MA, Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Smith V, Edwards SR, Clark AL. Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(5):555.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog... PMid:18355779.
 
eISSN:2516-3507
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top