ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The choice of treatment for myocardial infarction based on individual cardiovascular risk and symptoms of coronary heart disease
 
More details
Hide details
1
International Kazakh-Turkish University by named H.A. Yasavi, Turkistan, Kazakhstan
 
2
City Cardiological Center, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
 
 
Online publication date: 2019-12-26
 
 
Publication date: 2019-12-26
 
 
Electron J Gen Med 2019;16(6):em183
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
According to the data of hospital mortality of patients of the Shymkent cardiological center, the most frequent case of the indicator at the stationary stage in patients with myocardial infarction occurs when the class of acute heart failure according to Killip II-IV is determined in patients, the level of blood glucose is more than 8.0 mmol/l, the level of blood creatinine is more than 123.8 mmol/l and the absence of arterial hypertension when entering the clinic. The main causes of mortality among such elderly and senile patients were Killip class II-IV, blood glucose level of more than 7.30 mmol/l, blood creatinine level of more than 141.4 mmol/l, belonging to the female sex and the absence of hypertension on admission. Implementation of coronary artery stenting taking into account risk factors affecting mortality in hospital in patients with acute myocardial infarction leads to a decrease in hospital mortality and long-term mortality, compared with conservative treatment. Implantation of drug-coated stents and uncoated metal stents equally reduced the mortality rate of myocardial infarction in patients. In elderly and senile patients with myocardial infarction in combination with diabetes mellitus after coronary artery stenting there is a deterioration in long-term survival. Long-term survival at the end of 2010-2018 was 83.67%, while in patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus - only 40.03%, p=0.045 (Log-rank test). Thrombolytic therapy did not improve survival in hospital and long-term patients in the elderly and senile age group. Implementation of thrombolysis in elderly and senile patients hospitalized up to 1.5 hours from the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarct, leads to an unreliable reduction in mortality (p=0.085), hospitalized later than 1.5 hours - there is an increase in mortality compared with patients without thrombolysis(p=0.848). Coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction reduced mortality in elderly and senile patients regardless of the time between the onset of symptoms of myocardial infarction and hospitalization (p=0.486 and p=0.004).
 
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Buleshov DM, Ermakhanova JA, Buleshov MA. Evaluation of the efficiency of resource provision of cardiology surby on the health status of the population of the Turkestan region. Bulletin of the doctors of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4:34-42.
 
2.
Buleshov DM. The modern views on the anatomy of the heart and the coronary vessels. The Bulletin of the doctors of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4:67-71.
 
3.
Yermakhanova ZhA, Buleshov DМ, Buleshov MА, Tuktibayeva SA. Resource provision of the cardiological service and population health status of the South Kazakhstan Region. Drug Invention Today, 2018;10(4):3470-4.
 
4.
Grinhal’h T. Fundamentals of Evidence-Based Medicine. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; Russian (Green-khalkh T Fundamentals of evidence-based medicine). GEOTAR-Media; 2006.
 
5.
Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris. The Task Force the management of stable angina pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology Eur Heart J., 2006;27(11):1391-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurhea... PMid:16735367.
 
6.
Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J, 2010;31:2501-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurhea... PMid:20802248.
 
7.
Katritsis G, Syontis GC, Kastraty A. Optimal timing of coronary angiography and potential intervention in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J, 2011;32:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurhea... PMid:20709722.
 
8.
Expert Consensus Document on the use of antiplatelet agents. The Task Force on the use of antiplatelet agents in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2004;25:166-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.... PMid:14720534.
 
9.
Rebrova OY. Statistical analysis of medical data. Application software package STATISTICA. M.:Media sphere; 2004. English (Rebrova O. Y. Statistical analysis of medical data. Application of the STATISTICA application package. Media sphere; 2004).
 
10.
Chulpanov UYu, Turdalieva BS, Buleshov MA. The main aspects of the introduction of high-tech medical care in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Proceedings of the XV international youth scientific and practical conference, Ekaterinburg, March 28, 2018 “Topical issues of development of modern society of Economics and vocational education”. Section IV- 213-219.
 
11.
Pepine CJ, Bourassa MG, Chaitman BR, et al. Factors influencing clinical outcomes after revascularization n the asymptomatic cardiac ischemia pilot (ACIP). ACIP Study Group. J Card Surg., 1999;14(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540... PMid:10678439.
 
12.
Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Clayton TC, et al. Seven-year outcome in the RITA-2 trial: coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy. J Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2003;42:1161-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-....
 
13.
Physterer M. Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in Elderly patients Investigators. Long-term outcome in elderly patients with chronic angina managed invasively versus by optimized medical therapy: four-year follow-up of the randomized Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in Elderly patients (TIME). Circulation 2004;110(10):1213-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR... PMid:15337691.
 
14.
Boden WE, O’rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. The evolving pattern of symptomatic coronary artery disease in the United States and Canada: baseline characteristics of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial. Am. J Cardiol., 2007;99(2):208-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjc... PMid:17223420.
 
15.
Min SY, Park DW, Yun SC. Major predictors of long-term clinical outcomes after coronary revascularization in patients with unprotected left main coronary disease: analysis from the MAIN-COMPARE study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv., 2010;3:127-33. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIN... PMid:20407112.
 
16.
Long-Term Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stents and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Multivesse Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Outcomes from the Asan Medical Center-Multivessel Revascu-arization Registry. J Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2011;57:128-37.
 
17.
Conti CR. Unstable angina before and after infarction: thoughts on pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Heart Lung, 1986 Jul;15(4):361-8.
 
18.
C. Richard Conti. Ischemic heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, April 2000;35(5)(Supplement 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-....
 
19.
Arutyunov GP. The Rate of formation of the necrosis focus and the severity of the clinical picture in acute myocardial infarction. Author’s thesis for the degree Doc. honey. sciences’. Moscow Honey. Stomat. Inst. by named Semashko, 1994.
 
20.
Panchenko EP, Dobrovolsky AB. Thrombosis in cardiology. Mechanisms of development and possibilities of therapy. Moscow, 1999:308.
 
21.
Ambrose JA, Tannenbllum MA, Alexopouluos D, et al. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am. Col.l Cardiol., 1088-12:56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1....
 
22.
Fitzgerald LA, Philips DR. Platelet membrane glycoproteins. In Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Basic principles and clinical practice. In RW Colman, J Hirsh, YJ Marder, EW Salzman (Eds.) (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott, 1987:572-93.
 
23.
Gram J, Jespersen J, Kluft С, Rijken DC. On the usefulness of fibrinolysis variables in the characterization of a risk group for myocardial reinfarction. Acta Med. Scand., 1987;221:149-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954... PMid:3591453.
 
24.
Bokarev IN, Dougalis SA. Thrombolytic therapy of myocardial infarction. BC, 1998;6(3):3-9.
 
25.
The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Management of acute myocardial infarction syndromes in patients presenting with St-segment elevation. Eur Heart J, 2003;24:28-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-....
 
26.
White H, Van de Werf F, Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation, 1998;97:1632-46. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR... PMid:9593569.
 
27.
Yavelov IS. Clinical aspects of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Farmateka, 2003;6:14-24.
 
28.
Col J, Decoster O, Hanique G. et al. Infusion of heparin conjunct to streptokinase accelerates reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction: results of double-blind randomized study (08IRI8). Circulation, 1992;86:1-259.
 
29.
Proceedings of the plenary session of the Moscow city society of cardiology. Thrombolytics and restoration of coronary blood flow in myocardial infarction. Cardiology, 1997;8:57-67.
 
30.
The International Study Group. In-hospital mortality and clinical course of 20, 891 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction randomized between alteplase and streptokinase with or without heparin. Lancet, 1990;336:71-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6....
 
31.
The GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N.Engl. J.Med., 1993;329:673-82. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM19... PMid:8204123.
 
32.
EMERAS (Estudio Mnlticentrico Estreptoquinasa Republicas de America de Sur) Collaborative Group. Randomized trial of late thrombolysis in patients of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet, 1993;342:767-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6....
 
33.
LATE Study Group. Late Assesment of thrombolytic efficacy (LATE) study with alteplse 6−24 hours after onset of acute myocardial infarction. Lancet, 1993;342:759-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6....
 
34.
The GUSTO investigators. An International randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med, 1993;329:673-82. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM19... PMid:8204123.
 
35.
Morrison LJ, Verbeek PR, McDonald AC, Sawadsky BV, Cook DJ. Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Jama, 2000 May 24;283(20):2686-92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2... PMid:10819952.
 
36.
Varshavsky SYu, Feldman CX, Zhuravlev KB, Borisov MV, Loginovskaya OA. Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction at the prehospital stage. Clinical medicine, 1991;4:38-41.
 
37.
Ketley D, Woods KL. Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Lancet, 1993;342:891-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6....
 
38.
Golikov AP, Zvereva TB. Immediate and long-term results of thrombolytic therapy in patients with myocardial infarction: the need for differentiated treatment. Cardiology, 1992;32(4):5-10.
 
39.
Topol EJ. Early myocardial reperfusion: an assessment of current strategies arction. Eur Heart J, 1996;17(Suppi E):42-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurhea... PMid:11824003.
 
40.
Maseri A. Pathogenetic mechanism of post-infarction angina. Eur Heart J., 1986 Dec- 7; Suppl:3-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurhea... PMid:3816826.
 
eISSN:2516-3507
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top