Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
About us
Aims and Scope
Indexing and Abstracting
Editorial Office
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Contact
For Authors
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Policy
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Copyright & Licensing
Publication Fees
Fast-Track Paper Publication Option
Conflict Interest Guidance
Submit an Article
Special Issues
News & Editorials
“Fake,” “Predatory,” and “Pseudo” Journals: Charlatans Threatening Trust in Science
Shifting the Journal submission-review system to the Editorial System Manuscript December 27, 2017.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Fetoinfantile losses in the north-west region of Russia
1
Doctor of Medical Sciences (Advanced Doctor), Rector of St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Chief Neonatologist of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russia
2
Head of the Department of Public Health and Health Care, St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Russia
3
Postgraduate at the Department of Public Health and Health Care, St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Russia
4
Associate Professor at the Department of Public Health and Health Care, St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Russia
Online publication date: 2018-12-28
Publication date: 2019-04-22
Electron J Gen Med 2019;16(2):em135
KEYWORDS
fetoinfantile lossesinfant mortalityneonatal mortalitystillbirthmortality rateneonatal pathology department
ABSTRACT
In order to assess fetoinfantile losses in the North-West of Russia, the official and operational data of the Federal State Statistics Service and the Central Research Institute of Health Organization and Informatization of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation for 2010-2016 were studied. It is established that the indicator of fetoinfantile losses in the North-West region is much lower than fetoinfantile losses in the whole Russia. The evaluation of the dynamic coefficient of fetoinfantile losses showed a decrease for the years 2012-2016, as in Russia in general and in the North-West region. The structure of fetoinfantile losses in 2016 in the Russian Federation was significantly dominated by the share of infant mortality, and in the North-West Federal district – stillbirth. In the structure of fetoinfantile losses attributable to the period of infant mortality, the largest share accounted for mortality in the early neonatal period. Reduction of fetoinfantile losses due to infant mortality has been achieved mainly due to early neonatal mortality. Level of fetoinfantile losses attributable to the period of early neonatal deaths had a direct correlation with mortality level of children with a body weight of 1000 grams or more in the departments of pathology of newborns. The frequency of deaths in children weighing 1000 grams or more in the neonatal pathology departments of the North-West Federal district is significantly higher than in the whole Russia. The survival rate of children with extremely low birth weight from the total number of children born with a body weight of 500-999 grams in the North-Western region exceeded the figure for the whole Russia by 48.32%.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Medik VA, Iurev VK. Public health and health care. 2-e is., correc. and suppl. M.: GEOTAR-Media 2016;608.
2.
Iurev VK, Moiseeva KE, Gluschenko VA, Kharbediya ShD. Guide to practical training in the study of morbidity of population. St. Petersburg: Sotis-Med 2018;587.
3.
Kharbediya ShD. Statistical accounting and standardization in health care. Saint Petersburg: Sotis-Med 2018;228.
5.
Ivanov DO, Shevtsova KG. Analysis of selected statistical indicators of the North-Western Federal district in the aspect of infant mortality and stillbirth. Pediatrician. 2018;9(2):16-21. https://doi.org/10.17816/PED92....
6.
Surkov DN, Ivanov DO, Mavropulo TK, Petrenko YuV. Morbidity and mortality of neonates born in gestational age 22-27 weeks. Children’s medicine of the North-West. 2012;3(3):14-7.
7.
Sakharova ES, Keshishyan ES. Principles of assistance to premature children in the post-neonatal period. Russian journal of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2014;59(1):40-5.
8.
Nove A, Matthews Z, Neal S, Camacho AV. Maternal mortality in adolescents compared with women of other ages: evidence from 144 countries. The Lancet Global Health. 2014;2:155-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-....
9.
Stephens BE, Vohr BR. Neurodevelopmental Outcome of the Premature Infant. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009;56(3):631-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.....
10.
World Health Organization. Levels and trends in child mortality. Geneva, 2012;32.
11.
Perlman JM. Neurology: neonatology questions and controversies. Saunders, Elsevier 2008;288.
12.
Lau C, Ambalavanan N, Chakraborty H, Wingate SM, Carlo AW. Extremely Low Birth Weight and Infant Mortality Rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):52-67. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2... PMid:23545381.
13.
Kusuda S, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Infants with Very Low Birth Weight in Japan. Center Variation, Pediatrics. 2006;118:1130 –8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2... PMid:16950943.
14.
Jacob J, Kamitsuka M, Clark HR, Kelleher SA, Spitzer RA. Etiologies of NICU Deaths. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):123-35. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2... PMid:25489010.
15.
Lee KS, Mori R, Kusuda S, Fujimura M, Xiang Y, Shah SP. Comparison of Mortality and Morbidity of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Between Canada and Japan. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):12-9.
16.
Baranov AA, Albitskiy VYu. Mortality of children population in Russia (tendencies, causes, and ways to reduce). M.: Union of pediatricians of Russia 2009;392.
17.
Polikarpov AV, Aleksandrova GA, Golubev NA, Tyurina EM, etc. Main indicators of the health of the mother and child, the activities of the service for childhood and obstetrics in the Russian Federation. M., FRIHOIMHRF 2018;170. Retrieved from http://mednet.ru/ru/statistika....
18.
Blondel В, Breart G. Mortalite foetoinfantile. Evolution, causes et tsd’annalyse. Eneyel. Med. Chir (Paris-France). Pediatrie; 1990.
19.
Wille L, Obladen M. Neugerborgen-Intensivpflege. Gru Richtlinien/Springer-Verlag-Berlin; 1984:377-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
20.
Baybarina EN, Filippov OS, Guseva EV. Modernization of maternity and childhood protection service in the Russian Federation: results and prospects. Obstetrics and gynecology 2013;12:4-9.
21.
Chuvakova TK, Karin BT. Introduction of effective technologies in the practice of organizations of maternity and childhood in Kazakhstan. Medicine and health organization. 2017;4(2):19-24.
22.
Egan M, Petticrew M, Thomas S, et al. Risk factors in home and community settings and their associations with population health. Public Health. 2014;8:227.
23.
Ivanova LA, Titkova EV. Clinical features of newborns in patients with perinatal losses. Pediatrician. 2018;9(2):16-21.
| eISSN: | 2516-3507 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
